On 2019-06-14 2:55 p.m., Koenig, Christian wrote: > Am 14.06.19 um 14:09 schrieb Emil Velikov: > >> That said, the proposal will not conflict with the DRM_AUTH removal. If >> anything it is step 0.5 of the grand master plan. > > That's the point I strongly disagree on. > > By lowering the DRM_AUTH restriction you are encouraging userspace to > use the shortcut and use the primary node for rendering instead of > fixing the code and using the render node. > > So at the end of the day userspace will most likely completely drop > support for the render node, simply for the reason that it became > superfluous. You can just open up the primary node and get the same > functionality. > > I absolutely can't understand how you can argue that this won't make it > harder to cleanly separate rendering and primary node functionality. FWIW, I agree with Christian on this. Also FWIW, the solution I'm working on for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/110903 should allow making libdrm_amdgpu always use a render node for rendering. For backwards compatibility it'll probably require adding a new variant of amdgpu_device_initialize though, since existing users may rely on the first amdgpu_device for a GPU using the DRM file description passed to amdgpu_device_initialize for rendering. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
