On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:18:54AM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:34 PM Hariprasad Kelam > > <hariprasad.kelam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > this patch fixes below compilation error > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c: In > > > function ‘dcn10_apply_ctx_for_surface’: > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c:2378:3: > > > error: implicit declaration of function ‘udelay’ > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > udelay(underflow_check_delay_us); > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > What branch is this patch based on? > > > > Alex > > Hi Alex, > > It is on linux-next drm-misc-next has Sam's header cleanup. I guess we pull linux/delay.h in implicitly somewhere, but not for all configs. -Daniel > > Thanks, > Hariprasad k > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c > > > index d2352949..1ac9a4f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c > > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > > * > > > */ > > > > > > +#include <linux/delay.h> > > > #include "dm_services.h" > > > #include "core_types.h" > > > #include "resource.h" > > > -- > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > amd-gfx mailing list > > > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
