On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:04 PM Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 6/3/19 10:55 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > To allow arm64 syscalls to accept tagged pointers from userspace, we must > > untag them when they are passed to the kernel. Since untagging is done in > > generic parts of the kernel, the untagged_addr macro needs to be defined > > for all architectures. > > > > Define it as a noop for architectures other than arm64. > > > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > > index 0e8834ac32b7..949d43e9c0b6 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > > @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ extern int mmap_rnd_compat_bits __read_mostly; > > #include <asm/pgtable.h> > > #include <asm/processor.h> > > > > +#ifndef untagged_addr > > +#define untagged_addr(addr) (addr) > > +#endif > > + > > #ifndef __pa_symbol > > #define __pa_symbol(x) __pa(RELOC_HIDE((unsigned long)(x), 0)) > > #endif > > > > Andrey, > > This patch has now become part of the other patch series Chris Hellwig > has sent out - > <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190601074959.14036-1-hch@xxxxxx/>. Can > you coordinate with that patch series? Hi! Yes, I've seen it. How should I coordinate? Rebase this series on top of that one? Thanks! > > -- > Khalid > _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
