On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:49:05PM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 5/23/19 2:11 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:51:40AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > >> On 5/21/19 6:04 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > >>> As an aside: I think Sparc ADI support in Linux actually side-stepped > >>> this[1] (i.e. chose "solution 1"): "All addresses passed to kernel must > >>> be non-ADI tagged addresses." (And sadly, "Kernel does not enable ADI > >>> for kernel code.") I think this was a mistake we should not repeat for > >>> arm64 (we do seem to be at least in agreement about this, I think). > >>> > >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/654481/ > >> > >> That is a very early version of the sparc ADI patch. Support for tagged > >> addresses in syscalls was added in later versions and is in the patch > >> that is in the kernel. > > > > I tried to figure out but I'm not familiar with the sparc port. How did > > you solve the tagged address going into various syscall implementations > > in the kernel (e.g. sys_write)? Is the tag removed on kernel entry or it > > ends up deeper in the core code? > > Another spot I should point out in ADI patch - Tags are not stored in > VMAs and IOMMU does not support ADI tags on M7. ADI tags are stripped > before userspace addresses are passed to IOMMU in the following snippet > from the patch: > > diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c > index 5335ba3c850e..357b6047653a 100644 > --- a/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c > +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/gup.c > @@ -201,6 +202,24 @@ int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int > nr_pages > , int write, > pgd_t *pgdp; > int nr = 0; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC64 > + if (adi_capable()) { > + long addr = start; > + > + /* If userspace has passed a versioned address, kernel > + * will not find it in the VMAs since it does not store > + * the version tags in the list of VMAs. Storing version > + * tags in list of VMAs is impractical since they can be > + * changed any time from userspace without dropping into > + * kernel. Any address search in VMAs will be done with > + * non-versioned addresses. Ensure the ADI version bits > + * are dropped here by sign extending the last bit before > + * ADI bits. IOMMU does not implement version tags. > + */ > + addr = (addr << (long)adi_nbits()) >> (long)adi_nbits(); > + start = addr; > + } > +#endif > start &= PAGE_MASK; > addr = start; > len = (unsigned long) nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT; Thanks Khalid. I missed that sparc does not enable HAVE_GENERIC_GUP, so you fix this case here. If we add the generic untagged_addr() macro in the generic code, I think sparc can start making use of it rather than open-coding the shifts. There are a few other other places where tags can leak and the core code would get confused (for example, madvise()). I presume your user space doesn't exercise them. On arm64 we plan to just allow the C library to tag any new memory allocation, so those core code paths would need to be covered. And similarly, devices, IOMMU, any DMA would ignore tags. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
