在 2019/5/23 19:03, Christian König 写道:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> Am 23.05.19 um 12:24 schrieb zhoucm1:
>>
>>
>> On 2019年05月22日 20:59, Christian König wrote:
>>> [CAUTION: External Email]
>>>
>>> BOs on the LRU might be blocked during command submission
>>> and cause OOM situations.
>>>
>>> Avoid this by blocking for the first busy BO not locked by
>>> the same ticket as the BO we are searching space for.
>>>
>>> v10: completely start over with the patch since we didn't
>>> handled a whole bunch of corner cases.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 77
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 4c6389d849ed..861facac33d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -771,32 +771,72 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
>>> * b. Otherwise, trylock it.
>>> */
>>> static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>> *bo,
>>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)
>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked,
>>> bool *busy)
>>> {
>>> bool ret = false;
>>>
>>> - *locked = false;
>>> if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
>>> reservation_object_assert_held(bo->resv);
>>> if (ctx->flags & TTM_OPT_FLAG_ALLOW_RES_EVICT
>>> || !list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
>>> ret = true;
>>> + *locked = false;
>>> + if (busy)
>>> + *busy = false;
>>> } else {
>>> - *locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
>>> - ret = *locked;
>>> + ret = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
>>> + *locked = ret;
>>> + if (busy)
>>> + *busy = !ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy - wait for a busy BO to become available
>>> + *
>>> + * @busy_bo: BO which couldn't be locked with trylock
>>> + * @ctx: operation context
>>> + * @ticket: acquire ticket
>>> + *
>>> + * Try to lock a busy buffer object to avoid failing eviction.
>>> + */
>>> +static int ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy(struct ttm_buffer_object *busy_bo,
>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>>> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket)
>>> +{
>>> + int r;
>>> +
>>> + if (!busy_bo || !ticket)
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> + if (ctx->interruptible)
>>> + r =
>>> reservation_object_lock_interruptible(busy_bo->resv,
>>> + ticket);
>>> + else
>>> + r = reservation_object_lock(busy_bo->resv, ticket);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * TODO: It would be better to keep the BO locked until
>>> allocation is at
>>> + * least tried one more time, but that would mean a much
>>> larger rework
>>> + * of TTM.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!r)
>>> + reservation_object_unlock(busy_bo->resv);
>>> +
>>> + return r == -EDEADLK ? -EAGAIN : r;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>> uint32_t mem_type,
>>> const struct ttm_place *place,
>>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>>> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket)
>>> {
>>> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL, *busy_bo = NULL;
>>> struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bdev->glob;
>>> struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>> - struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL;
>>> bool locked = false;
>>> unsigned i;
>>> int ret;
>>> @@ -804,8 +844,15 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>> spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>> list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
>>> - if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx,
>>> &locked))
>>> + bool busy;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx,
>>> &locked,
>>> + &busy)) {
>>> + if (busy && !busy_bo &&
>>> + bo->resv->lock.ctx != ticket)
>>> + busy_bo = bo;
>>> continue;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> if (place &&
>>> !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,
>>> place)) {
>>> @@ -824,8 +871,13 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (!bo) {
>>> + if (busy_bo)
>>> + ttm_bo_get(busy_bo);
>>> spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>> + ret = ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy(busy_bo, ctx, ticket);
>> If you rely on EAGAIN, why do you still try to lock busy_bo? any
>> negative effect if directly return EAGAIN without tring lock?
>
> Yeah, that would burn a lot of CPU cycles because we would essentially
> busy wait for the BO to become unlocked.
>
> When we only return in case of a deadlock the other thread can continue
> with its eviction while we reacquire all looks during EAGAIN handling.
>
> Even directly unlocking the BO as I do here is a bit questionable. But I
> couldn't get the original logic with finding a new BO to evict to work
> correctly, that's why I have the TODO comment in the function itself as
> well.
Yes, it looks very wired.
original logic should already work verified by Prike. Friendly, you
need go through lookup lru loop again, judge allowable, and whether
busy_bo->resv and requried_bo->resv are same, and make evict_allowable
in ctx for same lock of busy_bo before loop again.
Or at least, if busy_bo is evict allowable, you can direclty evict
busy_bo after locked successfully.
-David
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> -David
>>> + if (busy_bo)
>>> + ttm_bo_put(busy_bo);
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
>>> @@ -911,7 +963,8 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> return ret;
>>> if (mem->mm_node)
>>> break;
>>> - ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem->mem_type, place,
>>> ctx);
>>> + ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem->mem_type, place,
>>> ctx,
>>> + bo->resv->lock.ctx);
>>> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>>> return ret;
>>> } while (1);
>>> @@ -1426,7 +1479,8 @@ static int ttm_bo_force_list_clean(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>> while (!list_empty(&man->lru[i])) {
>>> spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> - ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type,
>>> NULL, &ctx);
>>> + ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type,
>>> NULL, &ctx,
>>> + NULL);
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>> spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> @@ -1797,7 +1851,8 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_bo_global *glob,
>>> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>> spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>> list_for_each_entry(bo, &glob->swap_lru[i], swap) {
>>> - if (ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx,
>>> &locked)) {
>>> + if (ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx,
>>> &locked,
>>> + NULL)) {
>>> ret = 0;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
