From: wentalou <Wentao.Lou@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1712fb1a2f6829150032ac76eb0e39b82a549cfb ]
amdgpu_bo_restore_shadow would assign zero to r if succeeded.
r would remain zero if there is only one node in shadow_list.
current code would always return failure when r <= 0.
restart the timeout for each wait was a rather problematic bug as well.
The value of tmo SHOULD be changed, otherwise we wait tmo jiffies on each loop.
Signed-off-by: Wentao Lou <Wentao.Lou@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 7ff3a28fc903..d55dd570a702 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -3158,11 +3158,16 @@ static int amdgpu_device_recover_vram(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
break;
if (fence) {
- r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo);
+ tmo = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo);
dma_fence_put(fence);
fence = next;
- if (r <= 0)
+ if (tmo == 0) {
+ r = -ETIMEDOUT;
break;
+ } else if (tmo < 0) {
+ r = tmo;
+ break;
+ }
} else {
fence = next;
}
@@ -3173,8 +3178,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_recover_vram(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
tmo = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo);
dma_fence_put(fence);
- if (r <= 0 || tmo <= 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("recover vram bo from shadow failed\n");
+ if (r < 0 || tmo <= 0) {
+ DRM_ERROR("recover vram bo from shadow failed, r is %ld, tmo is %ld\n", r, tmo);
return -EIO;
}
--
2.19.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
