Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/syncobj: add new drm_syncobj_add_point interface v4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:56 PM Koenig, Christian
<Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 15.04.19 um 20:54 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> >> Well, I've got commit rights as well.
> >>
> >> Going to remove the warning, add your rb and push everything if nobody
> >> objects in the next hour or so.
> > So this got committed and is in my -next tree, but where is the
> > userspace and igt tests?
>
> I was waiting for this to land in -next before pushing the libdrm
> changes with amdgpu test cases.
>
> As soon as those are committed Lionel and David wanted to commit the igt
> tests.

Testcases are ofc great, but that's not the userspace we're looking
for :-) All still khr embargo? Even if that's all available at under
khr nda, and reviewed by relevant folks I'm not sure we're setting a
great precedence here - if khr still wants to be able to change the
interface spec, casting the kernel uapi into stone is a bit premature.
Aside from that this excludes everyone without khr nda, which isn't a
nice move really. Note: Picky because this is winsys stuff, so
relevant beyond just a single driver - for driver/hw specific stuff it
makes sense to allow plenty of leeway to work around various embargos.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux