It should be gen4. pcie_bandwidth_available() seems not able to support gen4.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quan, Evan
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 3:48 PM
> To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>; Gui, Jack <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Xu, Feifei <Feifei.Xu@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx list <amd-
> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix Polaris10 PCIe dpm feature issue.
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> > Although, it looks like pcie_bandwidth_available() needs to be fixed
> > up to handle gen3 speeds (PCI_EXP_LNKCAP2). Maybe something for the
> > future once that gets fixed up.
> Not sure whether I understood it correctly. But the
> pcie_bandwidth_available() seems handling pcie gen3 correctly.
> [ 651.460629] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: cur_speed 22, cur_width 8
>
>
> Regards,
> Evan
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
> > Alex Deucher
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:42 PM
> > To: Gui, Jack <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Xu, Feifei <Feifei.Xu@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx list <amd-
> > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix Polaris10 PCIe dpm feature
> issue.
> >
> > I think you can even go a step further and just replace
> > amdgpu_device_get_min_pci_speed_width() with
> > pcie_bandwidth_available(). It does basically the same thing.
> > Although, it looks like pcie_bandwidth_available() needs to be fixed
> > up to handle gen3 speeds (PCI_EXP_LNKCAP2). Maybe something for the
> > future once that gets fixed up. Also, no need for tmp_speed, you can
> > just pass in NULL if you don't need the speed.
> >
> > With that fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:31 PM Gui, Jack <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attach correct patch again.
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Expand the fix to all asics, please help to review.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Jack Gui
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gui, Jack
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 10:28 AM
> > > To: 'Alex Deucher' <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>; Xu, Feifei
> > > <Feifei.Xu@xxxxxxx>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix Polaris10 PCIe dpm feature
> > issue.
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Expand the fix to all asics, please help to review.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Jack Gui
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:24 PM
> > > To: Gui, Jack <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix Polaris10 PCIe dpm feature
> > issue.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:35 AM Chengming Gui <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > use pcie_bandwidth_available to get real link state to update pcie
> > > > table.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chengming Gui <Jack.Gui@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > index 964a4d3..df8e58b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > @@ -3649,7 +3649,9 @@ static void
> > > > amdgpu_device_get_min_pci_speed_width(struct amdgpu_device
> > *adev, {
> > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adev->pdev;
> > > > enum pci_bus_speed cur_speed;
> > > > + enum pci_bus_speed tmp_speed;
> > > > enum pcie_link_width cur_width;
> > > > + u32 ret = 0;
> > > >
> > > > *speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> > > > *width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN; @@ -3657,6 +3659,11 @@
> > > > static void amdgpu_device_get_min_pci_speed_width(struct
> > amdgpu_device *adev,
> > > > while (pdev) {
> > > > cur_speed = pcie_get_speed_cap(pdev);
> > > > cur_width = pcie_get_width_cap(pdev);
> > > > + if (adev->asic_type == CHIP_POLARIS10)
> > > > + ret = pcie_bandwidth_available(adev->pdev, NULL,
> > > > + &tmp_speed,
> > > > + &cur_width);
> > >
> > > Any reason to not just do this for all asics?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > > + if (!ret)
> > > > + cur_width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_RESRV;
> > > >
> > > > if (cur_speed != PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
> > > > if (*speed == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > amd-gfx mailing list
> > > > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
