Re: WARNING at amdgpu_vm_sdma.c:85

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mhm, that is actually harmless. We somehow end up trying to submit a zero sized IB.

Going to double check tomorrow how this can happen.

Is the anything bad happening when you just remove the warning?

Christian.

Am 26.03.19 um 18:30 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2019-03-26 4:21 p.m., Michel Dänzer wrote:
I'm hitting some badness with piglit today, see the attached dmesg
excerpt. I was away for a couple of days, but looks like it might be
related to the VM changes? I'll try bisecting.
Bisected to:

602b5050d839c40572bbb19e9b17a37a150c1e3c is the first bad commit
commit 602b5050d839c40572bbb19e9b17a37a150c1e3c
Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Mar 18 14:26:24 2019 +0100

     drm/amdgpu: use the new VM backend for PDEs

     And remove the existing code when it is unused.

     Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
     Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx>
     Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>


The problem doesn't happen with this commit and the corresponding PTE
one reverted on current amd-staging-drm-next.



_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux