Pushed. Thanks!
Alex
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:36 PM Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> Please help, thanks.
>
> Best wishes
> Emily Deng
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:13 AM
> >To: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng@xxxxxxx>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri-
> >devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm] libdrm: Fix issue about differrent domainID but same
> >BDF
> >
> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:53 AM Emily Deng <Emily.Deng@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> For multiple GPUs which has the same BDF, but has different domain ID,
> >> the drmOpenByBusid will return the wrong fd when startx.
> >>
> >> The reproduce sequence as below:
> >> 1. Call drmOpenByBusid to open Card0, then will return the right fd0,
> >> and the
> >> fd0 is master privilege;
> >> 2. Call drmOpenByBusid to open Card1. In function drmOpenByBusid, it
> >> will open Card0 first, this time, the fd1 for opening Card0 is not
> >> master privilege, and will call drmSetInterfaceVersion to identify the
> >> domain ID feature, as the fd1 is not master privilege, then
> >> drmSetInterfaceVersion will fail, and then won't compare domain ID, then
> >return the wrong fd for Card1.
> >>
> >> Solution:
> >> First loop search the best match fd about drm 1.4.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng@xxxxxxx>
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> >
> >Do you need someone to commit this for you?
> >
> >Alex
> >
> >> ---
> >> xf86drm.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
> >> index 336d64d..b60e029 100644
> >> --- a/xf86drm.c
> >> +++ b/xf86drm.c
> >> @@ -584,11 +584,34 @@ static int drmOpenByBusid(const char *busid, int
> >type)
> >> if (base < 0)
> >> return -1;
> >>
> >> + /* We need to try for 1.4 first for proper PCI domain support */
> >> drmMsg("drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID %s\n", busid);
> >> for (i = base; i < base + DRM_MAX_MINOR; i++) {
> >> fd = drmOpenMinor(i, 1, type);
> >> drmMsg("drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns %d\n", fd);
> >> if (fd >= 0) {
> >> + sv.drm_di_major = 1;
> >> + sv.drm_di_minor = 4;
> >> + sv.drm_dd_major = -1; /* Don't care */
> >> + sv.drm_dd_minor = -1; /* Don't care */
> >> + if (!drmSetInterfaceVersion(fd, &sv)) {
> >> + buf = drmGetBusid(fd);
> >> + drmMsg("drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports %s\n", buf);
> >> + if (buf && drmMatchBusID(buf, busid, 1)) {
> >> + drmFreeBusid(buf);
> >> + return fd;
> >> + }
> >> + if (buf)
> >> + drmFreeBusid(buf);
> >> + }
> >> + close(fd);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + for (i = base; i < base + DRM_MAX_MINOR; i++) {
> >> + fd = drmOpenMinor(i, 1, type);
> >> + drmMsg("drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns %d\n", fd);
> >> + if (fd >= 0) {
> >> /* We need to try for 1.4 first for proper PCI domain support
> >> * and if that fails, we know the kernel is busted
> >> */
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> amd-gfx mailing list
> >> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
