On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:43:36PM +0000, Wentland, Harry wrote: > DRM actually bumped this to 32 due to an issue with a Dell 4k display. As I feared there is a retry counter higher in the code. My bad. > It depends. I wouldn't call one or the other more correct. I seem to remember > that the DP spec is quite vague on these retries but I could be mistaken. > Since our driver hasn't show any problems with the DRM code and I believe > others (such as i915) also pass DP compliance without issues I wouldn't > proactively change this. I reacted to this matter since my DP monitor had troubles getting out of DP off state (iiyama) with logs which did seem to point towards a failure of getting the EDID. It happens rarely, and I could not figure out a context to reproduce for sure. Could be gone for good with the latest fixes. I guess fixes for popular and defective hardware (for instance that dell 4k) from a compliance stand point have to go in the code unfortunately. regards, -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
