Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Only add rqs for initialized rings.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 30.01.19 um 02:53 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
I don't see another way to figure out if a ring is initialized if
the hardware block might not be initialized.

Entities have been fixed up to handle num_rqs = 0.

Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | 11 ++++++++---
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
index d85184b5b35c..30407e55593b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
  		struct amdgpu_ring *rings[AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS];
  		struct drm_sched_rq *rqs[AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS];
  		unsigned num_rings;
+		unsigned num_rqs = 0;
switch (i) {
  		case AMDGPU_HW_IP_GFX:
@@ -166,12 +167,16 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
  			break;
  		}
- for (j = 0; j < num_rings; ++j)
-			rqs[j] = &rings[j]->sched.sched_rq[priority];
+		for (j = 0; j < num_rings; ++j) {
+			if (rings[j]->adev) {

Better do "if (!ring[j]->adev) continue;".

With that done the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>.

Regards,
Christian.

+				rqs[num_rqs++] =
+					&rings[j]->sched.sched_rq[priority];
+			}
+		}
for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j)
  			r = drm_sched_entity_init(&ctx->entities[i][j].entity,
-						  rqs, num_rings, &ctx->guilty);
+						  rqs, num_rqs, &ctx->guilty);
  		if (r)
  			goto error_cleanup_entities;
  	}

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux