From: Kevin Wang <Kevin1.Wang@xxxxxxx>
Using virtual msg index is able to support all ASIC specific message values on
one smu upper layer.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <Kevin1.Wang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c
index c0ff55f..ff1120a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c
@@ -81,13 +81,17 @@ static int smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(struct smu_context *smu)
static int smu_v11_0_send_msg(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = 0, index = 0;
+
+ index = smu_msg_get_index(smu, msg);
+ if (index < 0)
+ return index;
smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
WREG32_SOC15(MP1, 0, mmMP1_SMN_C2PMSG_90, 0);
- smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, msg);
+ smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, (uint16_t)index);
ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
@@ -105,7 +109,11 @@ smu_v11_0_send_msg_with_param(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg,
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = 0, index = 0;
+
+ index = smu_msg_get_index(smu, msg);
+ if (index < 0)
+ return index;
ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
if (ret)
@@ -116,7 +124,7 @@ smu_v11_0_send_msg_with_param(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg,
WREG32_SOC15(MP1, 0, mmMP1_SMN_C2PMSG_82, param);
- smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, msg);
+ smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, (uint16_t)index);
ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
if (ret)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
