On 2019-01-07 5:00 a.m., Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:33:19PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2018-12-30 2:00 a.m., Yu Zhao wrote:
>>> Userspace may request pitch alignment that is not supported by GPU.
>>> Some requests 32, but GPU ignores it and uses default 64 when cpp is
>>> 4. If GEM object is allocated based on the smaller alignment, GPU
>>> DMA will go out of bound.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.2+
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
>>> index 15ce7e681d67..16af80ccd0a0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
>>> @@ -527,6 +527,22 @@ amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
>>> struct amdgpu_framebuffer *amdgpu_fb;
>>> int ret;
>>> + struct amdgpu_device *adev = dev->dev_private;
>>> + int cpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(mode_cmd->pixel_format, 0);
>>> + int pitch = mode_cmd->pitches[0] / cpp;
>>> +
>>> + if (pitch < mode_cmd->width) {
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Expecting pitch(%d)/cpp(%d) >= width(%d)\n",
>>> + mode_cmd->pitches[0], cpp, mode_cmd->width);
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> + }
>>
>> This should possibly be tested in drm_internal_framebuffer_create instead.
>
> It seems to me drm_format_info_min_pitch() in framebuffer_check()
> already does it. We could just remove the check here?
Yeah, looks like that should be fine.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
