Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu/virtual_dce: No need to pin the fb's bo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 27.12.18 um 15:30 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2018-12-24 7:08 a.m., Emily Deng wrote:
For virtual display, no need to pin the fb's bo.

Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng@xxxxxxx>

[...]

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index ea89c54..4e94473 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -188,10 +188,12 @@ int amdgpu_display_crtc_page_flip_target(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
  		goto cleanup;
  	}
- r = amdgpu_bo_pin(new_abo, amdgpu_display_supported_domains(adev));
-	if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("failed to pin new abo buffer before flip\n");
-		goto unreserve;
+	if (!adev->enable_virtual_display) {
+		r = amdgpu_bo_pin(new_abo, amdgpu_display_supported_domains(adev));
+		if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
+			DRM_ERROR("failed to pin new abo buffer before flip\n");
+			goto unreserve;
+		}
  	}
r = amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(&new_abo->tbo);
I think the amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart call could be skipped as well?

Yup agree.



@@ -242,9 +245,10 @@ int amdgpu_display_crtc_page_flip_target(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
  		goto cleanup;
  	}
  unpin:
-	if (unlikely(amdgpu_bo_unpin(new_abo) != 0)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("failed to unpin new abo in error path\n");
-	}
+	if (!adev->enable_virtual_display)
+		if (unlikely(amdgpu_bo_unpin(new_abo) != 0))
+			DRM_ERROR("failed to unpin new abo in error path\n");
This should be written as either

	if (!adev->enable_virtual_display &&
	    unlikely(amdgpu_bo_unpin(new_abo) != 0))
		DRM_ERROR("failed to unpin new abo in error path\n");

or

	if (!adev->enable_virtual_display) {
		if (unlikely(amdgpu_bo_unpin(new_abo) != 0))
			DRM_ERROR("failed to unpin new abo in error path\n");
	}


P.S. A lot of people are out for Christmas and New Year's.

Indeed and thanks for the good explanation of the background in the other mail. I didn't realized that this was actually a bug fix for a pin imbalance.

BTW: It's good practice to note information like that in the commit message.

Anyway with the comment above fixed the series is Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Christian.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux