Re: restart syncobj timeline changes v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Looks very very good, and I applied them in my local, and tested by ./amdgpu_test -s 9 and synobj_basic/wait of IGT today.

+Daniel, Chris, Eric, Could you also have a look as well?


-David



On 2018年11月28日 22:50, Christian König wrote:
Tested this patch set more extensively in the last two weeks and fixed tons of additional bugs.

Still only testing with hand made DRM patches, but those are now rather reliable at least on amdgpu. Setting up igt is the next thing on the TODO list.

UAPI seems to be pretty solid already except for two changes:
1. Dropping an extra flag in the wait interface which was default behavior anyway.
2. Dropped the extra indirection in the query interface.

Additional to that I'm thinking if we shouldn't replace the flags parameter to find_fence() with a timeout value instead to limit how long we want to wait for a fence to appear.

Please test and comment,
Christian.

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux