Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm: add syncobj timeline support v8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:45 PM zhoucm1 <zhoucm1@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
> >>> Went boom:
> >>>
> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108490
> >>>
> >>> Can we revert pls?
> >> Sorry for bug, please.
> > In fact, the bug is already caught and fixed, just the fix part isn't
> > in patch#1, but in patch#2:
> >
> > Have you reverted? If not, I can send that fix in one minute.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > David Zhou
> >>>
> >>> Also, can we please have igts for this stuff so that intel-gfx-ci could
> >>> test this properly before it's all fireworks?
> Hi Daniel V,
>
> Could you point me which problem I encounter when I run syncobj_wait of igt?
>
> jenkins@jenkins-MS-7984:~/freedesktop/igt-gpu-tools/tests$ ./syncobj_wait
> IGT-Version: 1.23-g94ebd21 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.19.0-rc5-custom+ x86_64)
> Test requirement not met in function igt_require_sw_sync, file
> sw_sync.c:240:
> Test requirement: kernel_has_sw_sync()
> Last errno: 2, No such file or directory

The test isn't even run because one of it's requirements isn't met. In
this case here you don't have the SW_SYNC stuff enabled, which is used
to for testing. CONFIG_SW_SYNC in the kernel. You could do a quick igt
patch to change the igt_require() to an igt_require_f() with something
like "You need to enable CONFIG_SW_SYNC in your kernel build" as the
help text.
-Daniel

>
> Thanks,
> David Zhou
> >> Seems we cannot avoid igt now and vulkan CTS isn't enough, I will
> >> find some time next week to lean IGT, looks v10 is need.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> David Zhou
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Daniel
> >>>
> >>>>> The rest in the series looks good to me as well,
> >>>> Can I get your RB on them first?
> >>>>
> >>>>> but I certainly want the radv/anv developers to take a look as
> >>>>> well as
> >>>>> Daniel suggested.
> >>>> Ping @Dave/Bas/Jason or other radv/anv developers, Could anyone of
> >>>> you take
> >>>> a look the rest of series for u/k interface? So that we can move to
> >>>> next
> >>>> step for libdrm patches?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> David
> >>>>> Christian.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> David Zhou
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Daniel
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
> >>>>>> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> amd-gfx mailing list
> >> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux