Adding a second irq source because of a different src_id is actually a bug. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h | 4 ---- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c | 27 ++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h index d17503f0df8e..500113ec65ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h @@ -46,10 +46,6 @@ struct amdgpu_sdma_instance { struct amdgpu_sdma { struct amdgpu_sdma_instance instance[AMDGPU_MAX_SDMA_INSTANCES]; -#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_SI - //SI DMA has a difference trap irq number for the second engine - struct amdgpu_irq_src trap_irq_1; -#endif struct amdgpu_irq_src trap_irq; struct amdgpu_irq_src illegal_inst_irq; int num_instances; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c index d4ceaf440f26..adbaea6da0d7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c @@ -502,12 +502,14 @@ static int si_dma_sw_init(void *handle) struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle; /* DMA0 trap event */ - r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 224, &adev->sdma.trap_irq); + r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 224, + &adev->sdma.trap_irq); if (r) return r; /* DMA1 trap event */ - r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 244, &adev->sdma.trap_irq_1); + r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 244, + &adev->sdma.trap_irq); if (r) return r; @@ -649,17 +651,10 @@ static int si_dma_process_trap_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_irq_src *source, struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry) { - amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[0].ring); - - return 0; -} - -static int si_dma_process_trap_irq_1(struct amdgpu_device *adev, - struct amdgpu_irq_src *source, - struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry) -{ - amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[1].ring); - + if (entry->src_id == 224) + amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[0].ring); + else + amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[1].ring); return 0; } @@ -786,11 +781,6 @@ static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_trap_irq_funcs = { .process = si_dma_process_trap_irq, }; -static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_trap_irq_funcs_1 = { - .set = si_dma_set_trap_irq_state, - .process = si_dma_process_trap_irq_1, -}; - static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_illegal_inst_irq_funcs = { .process = si_dma_process_illegal_inst_irq, }; @@ -799,7 +789,6 @@ static void si_dma_set_irq_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev) { adev->sdma.trap_irq.num_types = AMDGPU_SDMA_IRQ_LAST; adev->sdma.trap_irq.funcs = &si_dma_trap_irq_funcs; - adev->sdma.trap_irq_1.funcs = &si_dma_trap_irq_funcs_1; adev->sdma.illegal_inst_irq.funcs = &si_dma_illegal_inst_irq_funcs; } -- 2.14.1 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx