[PATCH xf86-video-amdgpu] Add checking color management properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Aaron,


thanks for the patch. Moving to the amd-gfx mailing list, where
xf86-video-amdgpu patches are reviewed. Comments inline below.


On 2018-09-10 1:14 p.m., Aaron Liu wrote:
> Add gamma_lut/degamma_lut/ctm checking before pushing
> staged color management properties on the CRTC.
> If above object is NULL, return directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Liu <aaron.liu at amd.com>
> ---
>  src/drmmode_display.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/drmmode_display.c b/src/drmmode_display.c
> index 68fca1b..006ae7c 100644
> --- a/src/drmmode_display.c
> +++ b/src/drmmode_display.c
> @@ -1116,6 +1116,11 @@ static int drmmode_crtc_push_cm_prop(xf86CrtcPtr crtc,
>  
>  	switch (cm_prop_index) {
>  	case CM_GAMMA_LUT:
> +		if (!drmmode_crtc->gamma_lut) {
> +			xf86DrvMsg(crtc->scrn->scrnIndex, X_WARNING,
> +				   "gamma_lut is NULL!\n");
> +			return BadRequest;
> +		}
>  		/* Calculate the expected size of value in bytes */
>  		expected_bytes = sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) *
>  					drmmode->gamma_lut_size;
> @@ -1154,11 +1159,21 @@ static int drmmode_crtc_push_cm_prop(xf86CrtcPtr crtc,
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case CM_DEGAMMA_LUT:
> +		if (!drmmode_crtc->degamma_lut) {
> +			xf86DrvMsg(crtc->scrn->scrnIndex, X_WARNING,
> +				   "degamma_lut is NULL!\n");
> +			return BadRequest;
> +		}
>  		expected_bytes = sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) *
>  					drmmode->degamma_lut_size;
>  		blob_data = drmmode_crtc->degamma_lut;
>  		break;
>  	case CM_CTM:
> +		if (!drmmode_crtc->ctm) {
> +			xf86DrvMsg(crtc->scrn->scrnIndex, X_WARNING,
> +				   "ctm is NULL!\n");
> +			return BadRequest;
> +		}
>  		expected_bytes = sizeof(struct drm_color_ctm);
>  		blob_data = drmmode_crtc->ctm;
>  		break;
> 

(How) were you able to actually trigger this condition in practice? The
only way I could imagine is via drmmode_output_set_property, in which
case I think it would be better to guard all the *cm_* related code
there with

	if (drmmode_cm_enabled(drmmode_output->drmmode)) {
		...
	}


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux