On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 2:23 PM Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> wrote: > > The fault reports the page number where the fault happend and not > the exact faulty address. Update the print message to reflect that. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c > index 6763570..d44c5e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > entry->src_id, entry->ring_id, entry->vmid, > entry->pasid, task_info.process_name, task_info.tgid, > task_info.task_name, task_info.pid); > - dev_err(adev->dev, " at address 0x%016llx from %d\n", > + dev_err(adev->dev, " in page starting at address 0x%016llx from %d\n", > addr, entry->client_id); > if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) > dev_err(adev->dev, > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
