On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am 23.08.2018 um 10:25 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
>>
>> That is certainly totally nonsense. dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()
>> is the function who is calling this callback.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou at amd.com>
>> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
>
>
> For this one: Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
As mentioned in the v1 thread, you can outright nuke this, no longer
needed. But this at least makes sense now. Ack either way.
-Daniel
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> index 3a8837c49639..d17ed75ac7e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> @@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static const char
>> *drm_syncobj_null_fence_get_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
>> static bool drm_syncobj_null_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence
>> *fence)
>> {
>> - dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
>> return !dma_fence_is_signaled(fence);
>> }
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
