[PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu/sriov: For sriov runtime, use kiq to do invalidate tlb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>Christian König
>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 6:50 PM
>To: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu/sriov: For sriov runtime, use kiq to do
>invalidate tlb
>
>Am 15.08.2018 um 11:48 schrieb Emily Deng:
>> To avoid the tlb flush not interrupted by world switch, use kiq and
>> one command to do tlb invalidate.
>>
>> v2:
>> Add firmware version checking.
>>
>> v3:
>> Refine the code, and move the firmware checking into
>> gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait.
>>
>> SWDEV-161497
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h      |  4 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c |  3 --
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c    | 15 +++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c    | 61
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> index 07924d4..67b584b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> @@ -210,6 +210,10 @@ enum amdgpu_kiq_irq {
>>   	AMDGPU_CP_KIQ_IRQ_LAST
>>   };
>>
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT       5000 /* in usecs, 5ms */
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL   5 /* in msecs, 5ms */
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY 20
>> +
>>   int amdgpu_device_ip_set_clockgating_state(void *dev,
>>   					   enum amd_ip_block_type block_type,
>>   					   enum amd_clockgating_state state);
>diff --git
>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> index 21adb1b6..3885636 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@
>>    */
>>
>>   #include "amdgpu.h"
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT	5000 /* in usecs, 5ms */
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL	5 /* in msecs, 5ms */
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY 20
>>
>>   uint64_t amdgpu_csa_vaddr(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> index 76d979e..c9b3db4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> @@ -4348,8 +4348,21 @@ static void
>gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>   						  uint32_t ref, uint32_t mask)
>>   {
>>   	int usepfp = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX);
>> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>> +	bool fw_version_ok = false;
>>
>> -	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(ring->adev))
>> +	if (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) {
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 42))
>> +			if ((adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) &&
>> +(adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
>
>Why "if (...) if (...)" ? Just if (... && ...) should do as well.
Ok, will modify.
>
>> +				fw_version_ok = true;
>> +	} else {
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000193) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
>> +			fw_version_ok = true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	fw_version_ok = (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10) ? fw_version_ok :
>> +false;
>> +
>> +	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && fw_version_ok)
>>   		gfx_v9_0_wait_reg_mem(ring, usepfp, 0, 1, reg0, reg1,
>>   				      ref, mask, 0x20);
>>   	else
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> index ed467de..3419178 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,60 @@ static uint32_t
>gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(unsigned int vmid)
>>   	return req;
>>   }
>>
>> +signed long  amdgpu_kiq_invalidate_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct
>amdgpu_vmhub *hub,
>> +		unsigned eng, u32 req, uint32_t vmid)
>
>Better make that function just a generic reg_write_reg_wait function, instead of
>specialized for tlb flushing.
Do you mean rename the function to amdgpu_reg_write_reg_wait?
>
>> +{
>> +	signed long r, cnt = 0;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	uint32_t seq;
>> +	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
>> +	struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
>> +
>> +	if (!ring->ready) {
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
>> +	amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_req +
>eng,
>> +					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>> +					    req, 1 << vmid);
>> +	amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq);
>> +	amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>> +
>> +	/* don't wait anymore for gpu reset case because this way may
>> +	 * block gpu_recover() routine forever, e.g. this virt_kiq_rreg
>> +	 * is triggered in TTM and ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue() will
>> +	 * never return if we keep waiting in virt_kiq_rreg, which cause
>> +	 * gpu_recover() hang there.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * also don't wait anymore for IRQ context
>> +	 * */
>> +	if (r < 1 && (adev->in_gpu_reset || in_interrupt()))
>> +		goto failed_kiq;
>> +
>> +	if (in_interrupt())
>> +		might_sleep();
>
>What should that be good for?
It is only used for the interrupt case.
>> +
>> +	while (r < 1 && cnt++ < MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY) {
>> +		msleep(MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL);
>> +		r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq,
>MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (cnt > MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY)
>> +		goto failed_kiq;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +failed_kiq:
>> +	pr_err("failed to invalidate tlb with kiq\n");
>> +	return r;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * GART
>>    * VMID 0 is the physical GPU addresses as used by the kernel.
>> @@ -332,6 +386,7 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev,
>>   	/* Use register 17 for GART */
>>   	const unsigned eng = 17;
>>   	unsigned i, j;
>> +	int r;
>>
>>   	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
>>
>> @@ -339,6 +394,12 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev,
>>   		struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub = &adev->vmhub[i];
>>   		u32 tmp = gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid);
>>
>> +		if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) ) {
>
>As discussed drop the sriov check here and use the KIQ path all the time.
Already drop it in the patch 2.

Best wishes
Emily Deng
>Christian.
>
>> +			r = amdgpu_kiq_invalidate_tlb(adev, hub, eng, tmp,
>vmid);
>> +			if (!r)
>> +				continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>>   		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>>
>>   		/* Busy wait for ACK.*/
>
>_______________________________________________
>amd-gfx mailing list
>amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux