On 2018-07-17 09:33 AM, Christian König wrote: > Am 17.07.2018 um 09:26 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 2018-07-17 08:50 AM, Christian König wrote: >>> Am 16.07.2018 um 18:05 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >>>> On 2018-07-13 08:47 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> Other opinions? >>> I understand the reason why Marek wants to do this, but I agree that >>> this is a little bit dangerous if used incorrectly. >>> >>> On the other hand I don't see any other way to sanely handle it either. >> Sanely handle what exactly? :) I still haven't seen any description of >> an actual problem, other than "the handle is stored in the hash table". > > Well the problem is that it's not "the handle" but rather "all handles" > which are now stored in the hash table. > > To begin with that is quite a bunch of wasted memory, not talking about > the extra CPU cycles. All that should be needed is one struct list_head per BO, 16 bytes on 64-bit. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
