On Tuesday 03 July 2018 09:50 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 PM Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal at amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/13/2018 9:45 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>>>> Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
>>>> stoney/cz") added support for the "BT_I2S" ACP i2s channel. As part of
>>>> this change, one additional acp resource was added, but the "num_resource"
>>>> count was accidentally incremented by 2.
>>>>
>>>> This incorrect count eventually causes mfd_add_device() to try to access
>>>> an invalid memory address (the location of non-existent resource 5.
>>>>
>>>> This fault was detected by running a KASAN enabled kernel, which produced
>>>> the following splat at boot:
>>>>
>>>> [ 6.612987] ==================================================================
>>>> [ 6.613509] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in mfd_add_device+0x4bc/0x7a7
>>>> [ 6.613509] Read of size 8 at addr ffff880107d4dc58 by task swapper/0/1
>>>> [ 6.613509]
>>>> [ 6.613509] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.14.33 #349
>>>> [ 6.613509] Hardware name: Google Grunt/Grunt, BIOS Google_Grunt.10543.0.2018_04_03_1812 04/02/2018
>>>> [ 6.613509] Call Trace:
>>>> [ 6.613509] dump_stack+0x4d/0x63
>>>> [ 6.613509] print_address_description+0x80/0x2d6
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? mfd_add_device+0x4bc/0x7a7
>>>> [ 6.613509] kasan_report+0x255/0x295
>>>> [ 6.613509] mfd_add_device+0x4bc/0x7a7
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x99/0xa8
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? mfd_add_devices+0x58/0xe4
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? __kmalloc+0x154/0x178
>>>> [ 6.613509] mfd_add_devices+0xa5/0xe4
>>>> [ 6.613509] acp_hw_init+0x92e/0xc4a
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_device_init+0x1dfb/0x22a2
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? kmalloc_order+0x53/0x5d
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? kmalloc_order_trace+0x23/0xb3
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0xce/0x267
>>>> [ 6.613509] drm_dev_register+0x169/0x2fb
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x217/0x242
>>>> [ 6.613509] pci_device_probe+0x101/0x18e
>>>> [ 6.613509] driver_probe_device+0x1dd/0x419
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? ___might_sleep+0x80/0x1b6
>>>> [ 6.613509] __driver_attach+0x9f/0xc9
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? driver_probe_device+0x419/0x419
>>>> [ 6.613509] bus_for_each_dev+0xbc/0xe1
>>>> [ 6.613509] bus_add_driver+0x189/0x2c0
>>>> [ 6.613509] driver_register+0x108/0x156
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? ttm_init+0x67/0x67
>>>> [ 6.613509] do_one_initcall+0xb2/0x161
>>>> [ 6.613509] kernel_init_freeable+0x25a/0x308
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? rest_init+0xcc/0xcc
>>>> [ 6.613509] kernel_init+0x11/0x10d
>>>> [ 6.613509] ? rest_init+0xcc/0xcc
>>>> [ 6.613509] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
>>>> [ 6.613509]
>>>> [ 6.613509] Allocated by task 1:
>>>> [ 6.613509] save_stack+0x46/0xce
>>>> [ 6.613509] kasan_kmalloc+0x99/0xa8
>>>> [ 6.613509] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x11a/0x13e
>>>> [ 6.613509] acp_hw_init+0x210/0xc4a
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_device_init+0x1dfb/0x22a2
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0xce/0x267
>>>> [ 6.613509] drm_dev_register+0x169/0x2fb
>>>> [ 6.613509] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x217/0x242
>>>> [ 6.613509] pci_device_probe+0x101/0x18e
>>>> [ 6.613509] driver_probe_device+0x1dd/0x419
>>>> [ 6.613509] __driver_attach+0x9f/0xc9
>>>> [ 6.613509] bus_for_each_dev+0xbc/0xe1
>>>> [ 6.613509] bus_add_driver+0x189/0x2c0
>>>> [ 6.613509] driver_register+0x108/0x156
>>>> [ 6.613509] do_one_initcall+0xb2/0x161
>>>> [ 6.613509] kernel_init_freeable+0x25a/0x308
>>>> [ 6.613509] kernel_init+0x11/0x10d
>>>> [ 6.613509] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
>>>> [ 6.613509]
>>>> [ 6.613509] Freed by task 0:
>>>> [ 6.613509] (stack is not available)
>>>> [ 6.613509]
>>>> [ 6.613509] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff880107d4db08
>>>> [ 6.613509] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-512 of size 512
>>>> [ 6.613509] The buggy address is located 336 bytes inside of
>>>> [ 6.613509] 512-byte region [ffff880107d4db08, ffff880107d4dd08)
>>>> [ 6.613509] The buggy address belongs to the page:
>>>> [ 6.613509] page:ffffea00041f5300 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
>>>> [ 6.613509] flags: 0x8000000000008100(slab|head)
>>>> [ 6.613509] raw: 8000000000008100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000100120012
>>>> [ 6.613509] raw: ffffea0004208520 ffff88010b001680 ffff88010b002cc0 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 6.613509] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>>>> [ 6.613509]
>>>> [ 6.613509] Memory state around the buggy address:
>>>> [ 6.613509] ffff880107d4db00: fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>>> [ 6.613509] ffff880107d4db80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>>> [ 6.613509] >ffff880107d4dc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>>> [ 6.613509] ^
>>>> [ 6.613509] ffff880107d4dc80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>>> [ 6.613509] ffff880107d4dd00: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>>> [ 6.613509] ==================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz at chromium.org>
>>> Acked-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal at amd.com>
>>
>>
>> Was this patch ever picked up? I can't find it in agd5f/linux.
>
> It wasn't applied. I don't see 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu:
> creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz") upstream yet either.
> Daniel, Vijendar, which ones do you want applied? Can you send me the
> patches?
>
> Alex
Hi Alex,
"drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz" patch exists
in drm-next branch. Please pick the patch .
Thanks,
Vijendar
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
