On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: > On 2018-06-01 03:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: >>> On 2018-06-01 02:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: >>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>>> >>>> Series is: >>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> >>> >>> Thanks. Is it okay to merge all of these via the amdgpu tree, or should >>> I wait for an ack from Jon and/or core DRM maintainers for that? >> >> GPU documentation usually goes through the drm trees. You might want >> to push patch 1 (drm_mm.rst fix) via drm_misc, but the rest are can go >> in via the amdgpu tree since they are amdgpu specific. > > I'd prefer merging all three patches together, since without patch 1, > patch 3 generates the warning below while generating documentation, and > the reference to the PRIME Buffer Sharing section doesn't work. > > .../linux/Documentation/gpu/amdgpu.rst:2: WARNING: undefined label: > prime_buffer_sharing (if the link has no caption the label must precede > a section header) That's fine. I'll take them all through the amdgpu tree. Alex > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
