On 2018å¹´05æ??16æ?¥ 03:31, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c | 4 ----
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> index 1f1dd70..2569a63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
> entity->last_scheduled = NULL;
>
> spin_lock_init(&entity->rq_lock);
> - spin_lock_init(&entity->queue_lock);
> spsc_queue_init(&entity->job_queue);
>
> atomic_set(&entity->fence_seq, 0);
> @@ -424,11 +423,8 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
>
> trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity);
>
> - spin_lock(&entity->queue_lock);
> first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node);
>
> - spin_unlock(&entity->queue_lock);
Is your spsc safely to be added simultaneously?
Regards,
David Zhou
> -
> /* first job wakes up scheduler */
> if (first) {
> /* Add the entity to the run queue */
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index 350a62c..683eb65 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ struct drm_sched_entity {
> spinlock_t rq_lock;
> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
>
> - spinlock_t queue_lock;
> struct spsc_queue job_queue;
>
> atomic_t fence_seq;
