[PATCH 10/21] drm/amd/display: Add back code to allow for rounding error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Den tis 10 apr. 2018 23:11Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com> skrev:

> From: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo at amd.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo at amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr at amd.com>
> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> index 4887c888bbe7..abd5c9374eb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> @@ -896,6 +896,17 @@ bool mod_freesync_is_valid_range(struct mod_freesync
> *mod_freesync,
>         unsigned long long nominal_field_rate_in_uhz =
>                         mod_freesync_calc_nominal_field_rate(stream);
>
> +       /* Allow for some rounding error of actual video timing by taking
> ceil.
> +        * For example, 144 Hz mode timing may actually be 143.xxx Hz when
> +        * calculated from pixel rate and vertical/horizontal totals, but
> +        * this should be allowed instead of blocking FreeSync.
> +        */
>

Hi, with this change the var names ending in *_in_uhz are a bit confusing,
also the integer division will not round up (take ceil) as seems to be the
intention from the above comment. Perhaps the comment needs to be improved?

BR
Nils


+       nominal_field_rate_in_uhz = div_u64(nominal_field_rate_in_uhz,
> 1000000);
> +       min_refresh_cap_in_uhz /= 1000000;
> +       max_refresh_cap_in_uhz /= 1000000;
> +       min_refresh_request_in_uhz /= 1000000;
> +       max_refresh_request_in_uhz /= 1000000;
> +
>         // Check nominal is within range
>         if (nominal_field_rate_in_uhz > max_refresh_cap_in_uhz ||
>                 nominal_field_rate_in_uhz < min_refresh_cap_in_uhz)
> @@ -921,7 +932,7 @@ bool mod_freesync_is_valid_range(struct mod_freesync
> *mod_freesync,
>
>         // For variable range, check for at least 10 Hz range
>         if ((max_refresh_request_in_uhz != min_refresh_request_in_uhz) &&
> -               (max_refresh_request_in_uhz - min_refresh_request_in_uhz <
> 10000000))
> +               (max_refresh_request_in_uhz - min_refresh_request_in_uhz <
> 10))
>                 return false;
>
>         return true;
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20180413/6affa67f/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux