> reserved vmid is independent on id_mgr And that is exactly the reason why I want to have that here. If we don't fix this reserving a VMID would otherwise give the process an unfair advantage while scheduling jobs. Regards, Christian. Am 01.02.2018 um 05:42 schrieb Chunming Zhou: > NAK, reserved vmid is independent on id_mgr, which is removed from id > mgr when process allocates reserved vmid. > > > Regards, > > David Zhou > > > On 2018å¹´01æ??31æ?¥ 23:47, Christian König wrote: >> To guarantee fairness between processes grab reserved VMID only when >> there is an idle one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> >> --- >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c | 12 +++++++----- >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c >> index c13cf7e79b2e..7a3d0de7425d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c >> @@ -268,11 +268,6 @@ int amdgpu_vmid_grab(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, >> struct amdgpu_ring *ring, >>      int r = 0; >>       mutex_lock(&id_mgr->lock); >> -   if (vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub]) { >> -       r = amdgpu_vmid_grab_reserved_locked(vm, ring, sync, fence, >> job); >> -       mutex_unlock(&id_mgr->lock); >> -       return r; >> -   } >>      fences = kmalloc_array(sizeof(void *), id_mgr->num_ids, >> GFP_KERNEL); >>      if (!fences) { >>          mutex_unlock(&id_mgr->lock); >> @@ -319,6 +314,13 @@ int amdgpu_vmid_grab(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, >> struct amdgpu_ring *ring, >>      } >>      kfree(fences); >>  +   if (vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub]) { >> +       r = amdgpu_vmid_grab_reserved_locked(vm, ring, sync, >> +                            fence, job); >> +       mutex_unlock(&id_mgr->lock); >> +       return r; >> +   } >> + >>      job->vm_needs_flush = vm->use_cpu_for_update; >>      /* Check if we can use a VMID already assigned to this VM */ >>      list_for_each_entry_reverse(id, &id_mgr->ids_lru, list) { >