On 2018å¹´01æ??19æ?¥ 16:25, Michal Hocko wrote: > [removed the broken quoting - please try to use an email client which > doesn't mess up the qouted text] > > On Fri 19-01-18 06:01:26, He, Roger wrote: > [...] >> I think you are misunderstanding here. >> Actually for now, the memory in TTM Pools already has mm_shrink which is implemented in ttm_pool_mm_shrink_init. >> And here the memory we want to make it contribute to OOM badness is not in TTM Pools. >> Because when TTM buffer allocation success, the memory already is removed from TTM Pools. > > I have no idea what TTM buffers are. But this smells like something > rather specific to the particular subsytem. And my main objection here > is that struct file is not a proper vehicle to carry such an > information. So whatever the TTM subsystem does it should contribute to > generic counters rather than abuse fd because it happens to use it to > communicate with userspace. > Â Â got it. thanks. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20180119/c16a200c/attachment-0001.html>
