> I don't understand why we need all existed update fence for CS We don't need all updates for CS, we just need all updates for per VM BOs for CS because we don't know which BOs are used in the CS. That's the overall problem of using per VM BOs, the kernel doesn't know what is actually used by this CS and what isn't. Because of this we need to expect the worst case and sync to all the va operations on per VM BOs in flight. > We need to expand va ioctl. Well, we could expand the VA ioctl to provide better performance but that can only be a second step. First of all we must fix the existing handling to do what is expected here. Regards, Christian. Am 11.09.2017 um 14:30 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing): > It still doesn't make sense, I don't understand why we need all existed update fence for CS, which could implicitly contain unrelated fence next CS used. For moved list case, we already synced. We should explicitly sync the needed fence. > > For per VM BOs, we lack mapping fence, that's why VM fault happens. We need to expand va ioctl. > > Regards, > David > > å??è?ªå??æ?? Pro > > Christian Ké°?ig <deathsimple at vodafone.de> äº? 2017å¹´9æ??11æ?¥ ä¸?å??8:00å??é??ï¼? > > Ok then we have a misunderstanding here. This applies to all per VM > BOs, not just kernel BOs. > > It's just that as long as the per VM BOs aren't used the handling is > still correct and we don't have any updates to UMD BOs we implicitly > wait on. > > Sorry I should have waited a bit more, but since it is a very rather > urgent bug fix I've already pushed it with Rogers rb. > > Regards, > Christian. > > Am 11.09.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing): >> My mean is you should add a condition in code to check if BO is kernel BO or not. I expect V3. >> >> Regards, >> David >> >> å??è?ªå??æ?? Pro >> >> He, Roger <Hongbo.He at amd.com> äº? 2017å¹´9æ??11æ?¥ ä¸?å??6:57å??é??ï¼? >> >> Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He at amd.com> >> >> Thanks >> Roger(Hongbo.He) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On >> Behalf Of Christian K?nig >> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:53 PM >> To: Zhou, David(ChunMing) <David1.Zhou at amd.com>; >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix VM sync with always valid BOs v2 >> >> Am 11.09.2017 um 11:10 schrieb zhoucm1: >> > >> > >> > On 2017å¹´09æ??11æ?¥ 17:04, Christian König wrote: >> >>> NAK, as Roger pointed, the performance of Vulkan Dota2 drops from >> >>> 72fps to 24fps. >> >>> >> >>> This patches will kill Per-vm-BO advantages, even drop to 1/3 of >> >>> previous non-per-vm-bo. >> >> >> >> This is irrelevant and actually a foreseen consequence of per VM BOs. >> >> >> >> If the performance drops is in-acceptable then the UMD shouldn't use >> >> this feature. >> > I got your mean, if UMD doesn't use this feature, then all BOs should >> > be kernel only, then this change should only be limited to kernel VM >> > BOs, not include UMD BOs. >> > With this limitation, I think the change also can fix your issue. >> >> Correct, yes. Can I get your rb or ab now? We need to get this fixed >> asap. >> >> Thanks, >> Christian. >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > David Zhou >> >> >> >>> all moved and relocated fence have already synced, we just need to >> >>> catch the va mapping but which is CS itself required, as my proposal >> >>> in another thread, we maybe need to expand va_ioctl to return >> >>> mapping fence to UMD, then UMD passes it to CS as dependency. >> >> >> >> That can be an addition to the existing handling, but first of all >> >> the current state must be corrected. >> >> >> >> There are at least two bug reports on the open driver fixed by this, >> >> so please review. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Christian. >> >> >> >> Am 11.09.2017 um 10:59 schrieb zhoucm1: >> >>> NAK, as Roger pointed, the performance of Vulkan Dota2 drops from >> >>> 72fps to 24fps. >> >>> >> >>> This patches will kill Per-vm-BO advantages, even drop to 1/3 of >> >>> previous non-per-vm-bo. >> >>> >> >>> all moved and relocated fence have already synced, we just need to >> >>> catch the va mapping but which is CS itself required, as my proposal >> >>> in another thread, we maybe need to expand va_ioctl to return >> >>> mapping fence to UMD, then UMD passes it to CS as dependency. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>> David Zhou >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 2017å¹´09æ??11æ?¥ 15:53, Christian König wrote: >> >>>> From: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> >> >>>> >> >>>> All users of a VM must always wait for updates with always valid >> >>>> BOs to be completed. >> >>>> >> >>>> v2: remove debugging leftovers, rename struct member >> >>>> >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> >> >>>> --- >> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 10 ++++++---- >> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 2 +- >> >>>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >>>> >> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c >> >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c >> >>>> index 8aa37e0..4681dcc 100644 >> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c >> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c >> >>>> @@ -752,10 +752,6 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_vm_update_pte(struct >> >>>> amdgpu_cs_parser *p) >> >>>> if (r) >> >>>> return r; >> >>>> - r = amdgpu_sync_fence(adev, &p->job->sync, >> >>>> vm->last_dir_update); >> >>>> - if (r) >> >>>> - return r; >> >>>> - >> >>>> r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, NULL); >> >>>> if (r) >> >>>> return r; >> >>>> @@ -810,6 +806,12 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_vm_update_pte(struct >> >>>> amdgpu_cs_parser *p) >> >>>> } >> >>>> r = amdgpu_vm_handle_moved(adev, vm, &p->job->sync); >> >>>> + if (r) >> >>>> + return r; >> >>>> + >> >>>> + r = amdgpu_sync_fence(adev, &p->job->sync, vm->last_update); >> >>>> + if (r) >> >>>> + return r; >> >>>> if (amdgpu_vm_debug && p->bo_list) { >> >>>> /* Invalidate all BOs to test for userspace bugs */ diff >> >>>> --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c >> >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c >> >>>> index 55f1ecb..5042f09 100644 >> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c >> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c >> >>>> @@ -1140,9 +1140,8 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_level(struct >> >>>> amdgpu_device *adev, >> >>>> goto error_free; >> >>>> amdgpu_bo_fence(parent->base.bo, fence, true); >> >>>> - dma_fence_put(vm->last_dir_update); >> >>>> - vm->last_dir_update = dma_fence_get(fence); >> >>>> - dma_fence_put(fence); >> >>>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_update); >> >>>> + vm->last_update = fence; >> >>>> } >> >>>> } >> >>>> @@ -1803,6 +1802,12 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct >> >>>> amdgpu_device *adev, >> >>>> trace_amdgpu_vm_bo_mapping(mapping); >> >>>> } >> >>>> + if (bo_va->base.bo && >> >>>> + bo_va->base.bo->tbo.resv == vm->root.base.bo->tbo.resv) { >> >>>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_update); >> >>>> + vm->last_update = dma_fence_get(bo_va->last_pt_update); >> >>>> + } >> >>>> + >> >>>> return 0; >> >>>> } >> >>>> @@ -2586,7 +2591,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_init(struct amdgpu_device >> >>>> *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm, >> >>>> vm->use_cpu_for_update ? "CPU" : "SDMA"); >> >>>> WARN_ONCE((vm->use_cpu_for_update & >> >>>> !amdgpu_vm_is_large_bar(adev)), >> >>>> "CPU update of VM recommended only for large BAR >> >>>> system\n"); >> >>>> - vm->last_dir_update = NULL; >> >>>> + vm->last_update = NULL; >> >>>> flags = AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS | >> >>>> AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CLEARED; @@ -2692,7 +2697,7 @@ >> >>>> void amdgpu_vm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm >> >>>> *vm) >> >>>> } >> >>>> amdgpu_vm_free_levels(&vm->root); >> >>>> - dma_fence_put(vm->last_dir_update); >> >>>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_update); >> >>>> for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS; i++) >> >>>> amdgpu_vm_free_reserved_vmid(adev, vm, i); >> >>>> } >> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h >> >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h >> >>>> index c1accd1..cb6a622 100644 >> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h >> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h >> >>>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct amdgpu_vm { >> >>>> /* contains the page directory */ >> >>>> struct amdgpu_vm_pt root; >> >>>> - struct dma_fence *last_dir_update; >> >>>> + struct dma_fence *last_update; >> >>>> /* protecting freed */ >> >>>> spinlock_t freed_lock; >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> amd-gfx mailing list >> >>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >> >> >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > amd-gfx mailing list >> > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170911/75f0a5bf/attachment-0001.html>
