Am 26.10.2017 um 19:56 schrieb Deucher, Alexander: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf >> Of Christian König >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:06 PM >> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: [PATCH 4/8] drm/amdgpu: don't wait interruptible while binding >> GART space >> >> From: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> >> >> Display can't seem to handle this correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> BTW: Harry & Andrey: It is probably a good idea to actually wait interruptible here. How problematic would it be for you guys to allow that? The only negative effect I could find of hand is some error printing in the DC code. Christian. > >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c >> index e5cab4b..3045701 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c >> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_bind(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, >> struct ttm_mem_reg *bo_mem) >> placements.flags = (bo->mem.placement & ~TTM_PL_MASK_MEM) >> | >> TTM_PL_FLAG_TT; >> >> - r = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &tmp, true, false); >> + r = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &tmp, false, false); >> if (unlikely(r)) >> return r; >> >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
