Hey Michel, Michel Dänzer wrote on 16.10.2017 18:05: > On 16/10/17 05:53 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: >> [Please CC me on all replies, I'm not subscribed to amd-gfx.] >> >> Hey, >> I'm not sure whether this is a bug or if I'm just missing something. I've got >> the following stack (Debian testing as a base): >> GPU: Hawaii PRO [Radeon R9 290] (ChipID = 0x67b1) >> Mesa: Git:master/c7a81dcea9 >> libdrm: 2.4.84-2 >> LLVM: SVN:trunk/r315850 (6.0 devel) >> X.Org: 2:1.19.3-2 >> Linux: 4.13.7 >> Firmware (firmware-amd-graphics): 20170823-1 >> libclc: Git:master/df9db2adca >> DDX (xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu): 1.4.0-1 >> >> In my xorg.conf I have (and if I read the manpage correctly, the »Option "DRI" >> "3"« line shouldn't even be necessary anymore): >>> Section "Device" >>> Identifier "Forced to amdgpu with DRI3" >>> Driver "amdgpu" >>> Option "DRI" "3" >>> EndSection >> >> But when I look at my Xorg.0.log or the output of eglinfo, I see the following >> lines: >> - Xorg.0.log: [ 15.305] (II) glamor: EGL version 1.5 (DRI2): >> - eglinfo: EGL version string: 1.5 (DRI2) >> >> My understanding was, that amdgpu supports DRI3 for quite some time now and >> therefore would expect to see something like "EGL version string: 1.5 (DRI3)". >> >> What am I missing? > > Only that those messages are about a different "DRI2" than the > alternative to DRI3. ah, I was not aware of that. What â??DRIâ?? is meant here then? > Setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose when running a client prints on stderr > whether it's using DRI3 or DRI2. Ok, glxgears prints with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose: libGL: Using DRI3 for screen 0 So everything seems fine and I was just confused by the different types of "DRI". Cheers, Kai -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 659 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20171016/3d09906d/attachment.sig>
