Am 13.10.2017 21:22, schrieb Harry Wentland: > On 2017-10-12 08:22 PM, Dieter Nützel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> next (regression) compilation error: >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_resource.c: In >> function â??resource_map_pool_resourcesâ??: >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_resource.c:1688:14: >> error: implicit declaration of function â??acquire_first_split_pipeâ??; >> did you mean â??acquire_first_free_pipeâ??? >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>   pipe_idx = acquire_first_split_pipe(&context->res_ctx, pool, >> stream); >>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>              acquire_first_free_pipe >> >> >> It is wrongly (?) guarded behind: >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN1_0) >> static int acquire_first_split_pipe( >>                struct resource_context *res_ctx, >>                const struct resource_pool *pool, >>                struct dc_stream_state *stream) >> [snip] >> > > Sent and merged a patch. This function only makes sense for DCN and > shouldn't > be called otherwise. Thanks for reporting this. I gotta make sure to > build > without the DCN flag in the future to avoid this. Hello Harry, I've included it by hand and tested it with and without CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_FBC (and already send my t-b). The sad thing is, that latest amd-staging-drm-next (#1c630e83443a) do NOT come back from screen blanking (KDE screen saver, blank after x minutes) any longer. I have to reboot. Nothing in the logs. Apart from this '[amd-staging-drm-next] regression - no fan info (sensors) on RX580' still stands. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2017-October/014065.html Last thing: 'amd-staging-drm-next' is still based on 4.13.0-rc5. Could it be 'updated' (rebased) on 4.13.4+ at least? Since 4.12-rc there seems to be an e1000 issue in the Linux kernel tree, which is fixed for my Fujitsu workstation with 4.13.4+, but not with 'amd-staging-drm-next'. Or should I switch to 'drm-next-4.15[-dc]-wip'? Thank you for GREAT OSS gfx-support from AMD! Dieter > > Harry > >> Thanks, >> Dieter