Hi, Alex Shouldn't the function return true when the refresh rate > 120? If so, same comment on patch 2. BR Nils Den 11 maj 2017 7:59 em skrev "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher at gmail.com>: Even if the vblank period would allow it, it still seems to be problematic on some cards. bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96868 Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c index 6dc1410..eb5d03b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c @@ -906,6 +906,12 @@ static bool ci_dpm_vblank_too_short(struct amdgpu_device *adev) u32 vblank_time = amdgpu_dpm_get_vblank_time(adev); u32 switch_limit = adev->mc.vram_type == AMDGPU_VRAM_TYPE_GDDR5 ? 450 : 300; + /* disable mclk switching if the refresh is >120Hz, even if the + * blanking period would allow it + */ + if (amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh(adev) > 120) + return false; + if (vblank_time < switch_limit) return true; else -- 2.5.5 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170512/c9aefc77/attachment-0001.html>