Le 20/12/2024 à 05:33, Alex Hung a écrit :
From: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
Two tests are added to VKMS LUT handling:
- linear
- inv_srgb
Reviewed-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
---
v7:
- Fix checkpatch warnings (Louis Chauvet)
- Adde a commit messages
- Fix code styles by adding and removing spaces (new lines, tabs and so on)
drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/tests/vkms_color_test.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c | 17 ++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.h | 13 +++++++
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/tests/vkms_color_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/tests/vkms_color_test.c
index b53beaac2703..d765c5eb5d88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/tests/vkms_color_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/tests/vkms_color_test.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_mode.h>
#include "../vkms_drv.h"
#include "../vkms_composer.h"
+#include "../vkms_luts.h"
#define TEST_LUT_SIZE 16
@@ -36,7 +37,6 @@ static const struct vkms_color_lut test_linear_lut = {
.channel_value2index_ratio = 0xf000fll
};
-
static void vkms_color_test_get_lut_index(struct kunit *test)
{
s64 lut_index;
@@ -49,6 +49,19 @@ static void vkms_color_test_get_lut_index(struct kunit *test)
lut_index = get_lut_index(&test_linear_lut, test_linear_array[i].red);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(lut_index), i);
}
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0x0)), 0x0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0x0)), 0x0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0x101)), 0x1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0x202)), 0x2);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int(get_lut_index(&srgb_inv_eotf, 0x0)), 0x0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_inv_eotf, 0x0)), 0x0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_inv_eotf, 0x101)), 0x1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_inv_eotf, 0x202)), 0x2);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0xfefe)), 0xfe);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp2int_ceil(get_lut_index(&srgb_eotf, 0xffff)), 0xff);
Did you see the kernel bot warning? I think you can simply add
EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(srgb_eotf) in vkms_lut.h.
}
static void vkms_color_test_lerp(struct kunit *test)
@@ -155,9 +168,33 @@ static void vkms_color_test_lerp(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, lerp_u16(0x0, 0x1, 0x80000000), 0x1);
}
+static void vkms_color_test_linear(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < LUT_SIZE; i++) {
+ int linear = apply_lut_to_channel_value(&linear_eotf, i * 0x101, LUT_RED);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(linear, 0x101), i);
+ }
+}
+
+static void vkms_color_srgb_inv_srgb(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u16 srgb, final;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < LUT_SIZE; i++) {
+ srgb = apply_lut_to_channel_value(&srgb_eotf, i * 0x101, LUT_RED);
+ final = apply_lut_to_channel_value(&srgb_inv_eotf, srgb, LUT_RED);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, final / 0x101, i - 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, final / 0x101, i + 1);
+ }
+}
+
static struct kunit_case vkms_color_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(vkms_color_test_get_lut_index),
KUNIT_CASE(vkms_color_test_lerp),
+ KUNIT_CASE(vkms_color_test_linear),
+ KUNIT_CASE(vkms_color_srgb_inv_srgb),
{}
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c
index 983654540ee5..ee3cfe153d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c
@@ -113,19 +113,8 @@ VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT s64 get_lut_index(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 channel
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(get_lut_index);
-/*
- * This enum is related to the positions of the variables inside
- * `struct drm_color_lut`, so the order of both needs to be the same.
- */
-enum lut_channel {
- LUT_RED = 0,
- LUT_GREEN,
- LUT_BLUE,
- LUT_RESERVED
-};
-
-static u16 apply_lut_to_channel_value(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 channel_value,
- enum lut_channel channel)
+VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT u16 apply_lut_to_channel_value(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 channel_value,
+ enum lut_channel channel)
{
s64 lut_index = get_lut_index(lut, channel_value);
u16 *floor_lut_value, *ceil_lut_value;
@@ -150,6 +139,8 @@ static u16 apply_lut_to_channel_value(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 chan
return lerp_u16(floor_channel_value, ceil_channel_value,
lut_index & DRM_FIXED_DECIMAL_MASK);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(apply_lut_to_channel_value);
+
static void apply_lut(const struct vkms_crtc_state *crtc_state, struct line_buffer *output_buffer)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.h
index 9316a053e7d7..67ae09913460 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.h
@@ -5,9 +5,22 @@
#include <kunit/visibility.h>
+/*
+ * This enum is related to the positions of the variables inside
+ * `struct drm_color_lut`, so the order of both needs to be the same.
+ */
+enum lut_channel {
+ LUT_RED = 0,
+ LUT_GREEN,
+ LUT_BLUE,
+ LUT_RESERVED
+};
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
u16 lerp_u16(u16 a, u16 b, s64 t);
s64 get_lut_index(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 channel_value);
+u16 apply_lut_to_channel_value(const struct vkms_color_lut *lut, u16 channel_value,
+ enum lut_channel channel);
#endif
#endif /* _VKMS_COMPOSER_H_ */
--
Louis Chauvet, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
