On Wednesday, January 22nd, 2025 at 22:05, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2025-01-15 02:56, Simon Ser wrote: > > > Is this "ignore" something we could do at the core DRM level, instead > > of doing it in all drivers? e.g. by silently ignoring user-space requests > > to set the property? > > I think it'd be better to reject setting the property. The problem > is that a client without the COLOR_PIPELINE client cap might have > set these properties and we'll want to ignore that when we are > programming a commit with a color pipeline. > > Since it's the drivers that decide on the programming based on > the states it's up to each driver to ignore the deprecated > properties. Right. Maybe the "plane_color_pipeline" field could be renamed to e.g. "ignore_plane_color_space_and_encoding" to make it clearer what drivers are expected to do based on this? Either way, sounds good.
