On 1/8/2025 02:56, Jiang Liu wrote:
Enhance error handling in function amdgpu_pci_probe() to avoid
possible resource leakage.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
index 41d1b06be600..f8deca2f2696 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
@@ -2346,16 +2346,16 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
msleep(5000);
goto retry_init;
} else if (ret) {
- goto err_pci;
+ goto unload_kms;
This label change looks wrong to me. If you fail to
amdgpu_driver_load_kms(), why would you amdgpu_driver_unload_kms()?
amdgpu_driver_load_kms() has cleanup handling already to call
amdgpu_driver_unload_kms()
}
ret = amdgpu_xcp_dev_register(adev, ent);
if (ret)
- goto err_pci;
+ goto unplug_drm;
ret = amdgpu_amdkfd_drm_client_create(adev);
if (ret)
- goto err_pci;
+ goto deregister_xcp;
/*
* 1. don't init fbdev on hw without DCE
@@ -2424,6 +2424,12 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return 0;
+deregister_xcp:
+ amdgpu_xcp_dev_deregister(adev);
+unplug_drm:
+ drm_dev_unplug(ddev);
+unload_kms:
+ amdgpu_driver_unload_kms(ddev);
err_pci:
pci_disable_device(pdev);
return ret;
