Em 13/12/2024 11:36, Raag Jadav escreveu:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:15:31AM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
Hi Christian,
Em 13/12/2024 04:34, Christian König escreveu:
Am 12.12.24 um 20:09 schrieb André Almeida:
Use DRM's device wedged event to notify userspace that a reset had
happened. For now, only use `none` method meant for telemetry
capture.
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 96316111300a..19e1a5493778 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -6057,6 +6057,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
amdgpu_device *adev,
dev_info(adev->dev, "GPU reset end with ret = %d\n", r);
atomic_set(&adev->reset_domain->reset_res, r);
+
+ drm_dev_wedged_event(adev_to_drm(adev), DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE);
That looks really good in general. I would just make the
DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE depend on the value of "r".
Why depend or `r`? A reset was triggered anyway, regardless of the success
of it, shouldn't we tell userspace?
A failed reset would perhaps result in wedging, atleast that's how i915
is handling it.
Right, and I think this raises the question of what wedge recovery
method should I add for amdgpu... Christian?
