On 2024-12-13 01:52, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
This commit enlarges the hashtable size of
kfd_process to 256
That's obvious. Can you state the reason why you're making that change?
Does this change make sense stand-alone, or should it be part of your
multi-context patch series?
Regards,
Felix
Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
index 9e5ca0b93b2a..7b2049720c6a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ struct kfd_process {
struct kfd_runtime_info runtime_info;
};
-#define KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE 5 /* bits: 32 entries */
+#define KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE 8 /* bits: 256 entries */
extern DECLARE_HASHTABLE(kfd_processes_table, KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE);
extern struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
