RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add secure display v2 command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Public]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Jinzhou Su
>Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2024 11:31 AM
>To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; Lin, Wayne
><Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>; Strauss, Andrew <Andrew.Strauss@xxxxxxx>; Su, Joe
><Jinzhou.Su@xxxxxxx>; Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add secure display v2 command
>
>Add secure display v2 command to support multiple ROI instances per display.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Jinzhou Su <jinzhou.su@xxxxxxx>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c       |  3 ++-
> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_secureDisplay_if.h  | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
>index f015961f257a..12832fd834fb 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
>@@ -2264,7 +2264,8 @@ int psp_securedisplay_invoke(struct psp_context *psp,
>uint32_t ta_cmd_id)
>               return -EINVAL;
>
>       if (ta_cmd_id != TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__QUERY_TA &&
>-          ta_cmd_id != TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__SEND_ROI_CRC)
>+          ta_cmd_id != TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__SEND_ROI_CRC &&
>+          ta_cmd_id != TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__SEND_ROI_CRC_V2)
>               return -EINVAL;
>
>       ret = psp_ta_invoke(psp, ta_cmd_id, &psp->securedisplay_context.context);
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_secureDisplay_if.h
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_secureDisplay_if.h
>index 00d8bdb8254f..c5eddd685390 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_secureDisplay_if.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_secureDisplay_if.h
>@@ -31,10 +31,12 @@
>  *    Secure Display Command ID
>  */
> enum ta_securedisplay_command {
>-      /* Query whether TA is responding used only for validation purpose */
>+      /* Query whether TA is responding. It is used only for validation
>+purpose */
>       TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__QUERY_TA              = 1,
>       /* Send region of Interest and CRC value to I2C */
>       TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__SEND_ROI_CRC          = 2,
>+      /* V2 to send multiple regions of Interest and CRC value to I2C */
>+      TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__SEND_ROI_CRC_V2       = 3,
>       /* Maximum Command ID */
>       TA_SECUREDISPLAY_COMMAND__MAX_ID                = 0x7FFFFFFF,
> };
>@@ -83,6 +85,8 @@ enum ta_securedisplay_ta_query_cmd_ret {  enum
>ta_securedisplay_buffer_size {
>       /* 15 bytes = 8 byte (ROI) + 6 byte(CRC) + 1 byte(phy_id) */
>       TA_SECUREDISPLAY_I2C_BUFFER_SIZE                = 15,
>+      /* 15 bytes = 8 byte (ROI) + 6 byte(CRC) + 1 byte(phy_id) + 1 byte(roi_idx) */

A typo? 15 bytes -> 16 bytes

>+      TA_SECUREDISPLAY_V2_I2C_BUFFER_SIZE             = 16,
> };
>
> /** Input/output structures for Secure Display commands */ @@ -98,12 +102,21 @@
>struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_input {
>       uint32_t  phy_id;  /* Physical ID */
> };
>
>+struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_input
>+{
>+   uint32_t phy_id;  /* Physical ID */
>+   uint8_t  roi_idx; /* Region of interest index */ };
>+

Coding style issue.

Use
struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_input {

};

instead of
struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_input
{

};

> /** @union ta_securedisplay_cmd_input
>  *    Input buffer
>  */
> union ta_securedisplay_cmd_input {
>       /* send ROI and CRC input buffer format */
>       struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_input        send_roi_crc;
>+      /* send ROI and CRC input buffer format, v2 adds a ROI index */
>+      struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_input     send_roi_crc_v2;
>+      /* Reserved space for future expansion */
>       uint32_t                                          reserved[4];
> };
>
>@@ -128,6 +141,11 @@ struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_output {
>       uint8_t  reserved;
> };
>
>+struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_output
>+{
>+   uint8_t  i2c_buf[TA_SECUREDISPLAY_V2_I2C_BUFFER_SIZE];  /* I2C
>+buffer */ };

Coding style issue.

Use
struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_output {

};

instead of
struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_output
{

};

Regards,
Lang

>+
> /** @union ta_securedisplay_cmd_output
>  *    Output buffer
>  */
>@@ -136,6 +154,8 @@ union ta_securedisplay_cmd_output {
>       struct ta_securedisplay_query_ta_output            query_ta;
>       /* Send ROI CRC output buffer format used only for validation purpose */
>       struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_output        send_roi_crc;
>+      /* Send ROI CRC output buffer format used only for validation purpose */
>+      struct ta_securedisplay_send_roi_crc_v2_output     send_roi_crc_v2;
>       uint32_t                                           reserved[4];
> };
>
>--
>2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux