Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/amd: Invert APU check for amdgpu_device_evict_resources()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 11:17 AM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Resource eviction isn't needed for s3 or s2idle on APUs, but should
> be run for S4. As amdgpu_device_evict_resources() will be called
> by prepare notifier adjust logic so that APUs only cover S4.
>
> Suggested-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> --
> v2:
>  * New patch
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 11d344166ba7..d511ba949dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -4744,8 +4744,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_evict_resources(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>  {
>         int ret;
>
> -       /* No need to evict vram on APUs for suspend to ram or s2idle */
> -       if ((adev->in_s3 || adev->in_s0ix) && (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU))
> +       /* No need to evict vram on APUs unless going to S4 */
> +       if (!adev->in_s4 && (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU))

Will the in_s4 flag be set at this point?

Alex

>                 return 0;
>
>         ret = amdgpu_ttm_evict_resources(adev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
> --
> 2.34.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux