Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/admgpu: clean the dummy sw_init functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/9/2024 4:21 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 09.10.24 um 10:48 schrieb Sunil Khatri:
Remove the dummy sw_init functions and set the
corresponding functions to NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_isp.c | 5 -----
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik.c        | 7 +------
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c         | 7 +------
  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_isp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_isp.c
index adc0b80ca5db..4add6c412779 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_isp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_isp.c
@@ -33,11 +33,6 @@
  #include "isp_v4_1_0.h"
  #include "isp_v4_1_1.h"
  -static int isp_sw_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
-{
-    return 0;
-}
-
  static int isp_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
  {
      return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik.c
index 6c18ab35cf69..bb961b274487 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik.c
@@ -2124,11 +2124,6 @@ static int cik_common_early_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
      return 0;
  }
  -static int cik_common_sw_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
-{
-    return 0;
-}
-
  static int cik_common_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
  {
      return 0;
@@ -2195,7 +2190,7 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs cik_common_ip_funcs = {
      .name = "cik_common",
      .early_init = cik_common_early_init,
      .late_init = NULL,
-    .sw_init = cik_common_sw_init,
+    .sw_init = NULL,
      .sw_fini = cik_common_sw_fini,
      .hw_init = cik_common_hw_init,
      .hw_fini = cik_common_hw_fini,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
index b9934661a92e..0578c7ce4dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c
@@ -2148,11 +2148,6 @@ static int si_common_early_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
      return 0;
  }
  -static int si_common_sw_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
-{
-    return 0;
-}
-
  static int si_common_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
  {
      return 0;
@@ -2691,7 +2686,7 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs si_common_ip_funcs = {
      .name = "si_common",
      .early_init = si_common_early_init,
      .late_init = NULL,
-    .sw_init = si_common_sw_init,
+    .sw_init = NULL,

BTW don't do that, just don't initialize the field at all.

Uninitialized fields in global variables are NULL or 0 in C by standard definition and Greg usually complains if we do stuff like that.
Sure will remove the initialization completely for it in v3 patch set.

Regards,
Christian.

      .sw_fini = si_common_sw_fini,
      .hw_init = si_common_hw_init,
      .hw_fini = si_common_hw_fini,




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux