While working on the CTM implementation of VKMS I had to ascertain
myself of a few assumptions. One of those is whether drm_fixed.h
treats its numbers using signed-magnitude or twos-complement. It is
twos-complement.
In order to make someone else's day easier I am adding the
drm_test_int2fixp test that validates the above assumption.
I am also adding a test for the new sm2fixp function that converts
from a signed-magnitude fixed point to the twos-complement fixed
point.
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
---
v6:
- add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION (Jeff Johnson)
- fix buffer overflow
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_fixp_test.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_fixp_test.c
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
index 56dab563abd7..bd69df0eee33 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST) += \
drm_modes_test.o \
drm_plane_helper_test.o \
drm_probe_helper_test.o \
- drm_rect_test.o
+ drm_rect_test.o \
+ drm_fixp_test.o
CFLAGS_drm_mm_test.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_fixp_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_fixp_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..24a801cf38be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_fixp_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright 2022 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <drm/drm_fixed.h>
+
+static void drm_test_sm2fixp(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x7fffffffffffffffll, ((1ull << 63) - 1));
+
+ /* 1 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_int2fixp(1), drm_sm2fixp(1ull << DRM_FIXED_POINT));
+
+ /* -1 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_int2fixp(-1), drm_sm2fixp((1ull << 63) | (1ull << DRM_FIXED_POINT)));
+
+ /* 0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp_from_fraction(1, 2), drm_sm2fixp(1ull << (DRM_FIXED_POINT - 1)));
+
+ /* -0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_fixp_from_fraction(-1, 2), drm_sm2fixp((1ull << 63) | (1ull << (DRM_FIXED_POINT - 1))));
+
+}
+
+static void drm_test_int2fixp(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* 1 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ll << 32, drm_int2fixp(1));
+
+ /* -1 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -(1ll << 32), drm_int2fixp(-1));
+
+ /* 1 + (-1) = 0 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, drm_int2fixp(1) + drm_int2fixp(-1));
+
+ /* 1 / 2 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ll << 31, drm_fixp_from_fraction(1, 2));
+
+ /* -0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -(1ll << 31), drm_fixp_from_fraction(-1, 2));
+
+ /* (1 / 2) + (-1) = 0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ll << 31, drm_fixp_from_fraction(-1, 2) + drm_int2fixp(1));
+
+ /* (1 / 2) - 1) = 0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -(1ll << 31), drm_fixp_from_fraction(1, 2) + drm_int2fixp(-1));
+
+ /* (1 / 2) - 1) = 0.5 */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -(1ll << 31), drm_fixp_from_fraction(1, 2) - drm_int2fixp(1));
+
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case drm_fixp_tests[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_int2fixp),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_sm2fixp),
+ { }
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite drm_rect_test_suite = {
+ .name = "drm_fixp",
+ .test_cases = drm_fixp_tests,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(drm_rect_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("AMD");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL and additional rights");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Unit tests for drm_fixed.h");
\ No newline at end of file
--
2.46.2
