[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
Hi @Lazar, Lijo,
Can you help review this?
Thanks,
Victor
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 12:08 AM
To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@xxxxxxx>; Zhao, Victor <Victor.Zhao@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix the inst passed to amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw
the inst passed to amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw should be physical instance.
Fix the miss matched code.
Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 18 +++++++++---------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index e72e774d17e6..e74789691070 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_device_xcc_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
amdgpu_virt_get_rlcg_reg_access_flag(adev, acc_flags,
GC_HWIP, false,
&rlcg_flag)) {
- ret = amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(adev, reg, 0, rlcg_flag, xcc_id);
+ ret = amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(adev, reg, 0, rlcg_flag, GET_INST(GC,
+xcc_id));
} else if (!(acc_flags & AMDGPU_REGS_NO_KIQ) &&
amdgpu_sriov_runtime(adev) &&
down_read_trylock(&adev->reset_domain->sem)) { @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ void amdgpu_device_xcc_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
amdgpu_virt_get_rlcg_reg_access_flag(adev, acc_flags,
GC_HWIP, true,
&rlcg_flag)) {
- amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(adev, reg, v, rlcg_flag, xcc_id);
+ amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(adev, reg, v, rlcg_flag, GET_INST(GC,
+xcc_id));
} else if (!(acc_flags & AMDGPU_REGS_NO_KIQ) &&
amdgpu_sriov_runtime(adev) &&
down_read_trylock(&adev->reset_domain->sem)) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 094c08cb98e7..350f6b6676f1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
ack = hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + hub->eng_distance * eng;
if (vmhub >= AMDGPU_MMHUB0(0))
- inst = GET_INST(GC, 0);
+ inst = 0;
else
inst = vmhub;
@@ -876,9 +876,9 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
for (j = 0; j < adev->usec_timeout; j++) {
/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acquire */
if (vmhub >= AMDGPU_MMHUB0(0))
- tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, sem, inst);
+ tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, sem, GET_INST(GC, inst));
else
- tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, sem, inst);
+ tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, sem, GET_INST(GC, inst));
if (tmp & 0x1)
break;
udelay(1);
@@ -889,9 +889,9 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
}
if (vmhub >= AMDGPU_MMHUB0(0))
- WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, req, inv_req, inst);
+ WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, req, inv_req, GET_INST(GC, inst));
else
- WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, req, inv_req, inst);
+ WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, req, inv_req, GET_INST(GC, inst));
/*
* Issue a dummy read to wait for the ACK register to @@ -904,9 +904,9 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
for (j = 0; j < adev->usec_timeout; j++) {
if (vmhub >= AMDGPU_MMHUB0(0))
- tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, ack, inst);
+ tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, ack, GET_INST(GC, inst));
else
- tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, ack, inst);
+ tmp = RREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, ack, GET_INST(GC, inst));
if (tmp & (1 << vmid))
break;
udelay(1);
@@ -919,9 +919,9 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
* write with 0 means semaphore release
*/
if (vmhub >= AMDGPU_MMHUB0(0))
- WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, sem, 0, inst);
+ WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(MMHUB, sem, 0, GET_INST(GC, inst));
else
- WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, sem, 0, inst);
+ WREG32_SOC15_IP_NO_KIQ(GC, sem, 0, GET_INST(GC, inst));
}
spin_unlock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
--
2.34.1
