On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:24 PM Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> In that case those are the already known problems with the scheduler > >> changes, aren't they? > > > > Yes. Those changes went into 6.7 though, not 6.6 AFAIK. Maybe I'm > > misunderstanding what the original report was actually testing. If it > > was 6.7, then try reverting: > > 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5 > > b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c > > At some point it was suggested that I file a gitlab issue, but I took > this to mean it was already known and being worked on. -rc3 came out > today and still has the problem. Is there a known issue I could track? > At this point, unless there are any objections, I think we should just revert the two patches. Alex
