Just a quick update: things a getting into shape slowly since my paternal vacancy is over, but I'm still progressing. I'm debugging things as I can. I managed to work around the missing header with the current firmware after analyzing what it contains and where it is used. I'm more interested than ever to have VCE and UVD ported to amdgpu, since we now have cards from the 300 series at work (one based on GCN 1, the other on GCN 2). By the way, the R7 360 (based on GCN 2, Bonaire Pro) fails to load the amdgpu driver because of an error in VCE 2 implementation. I'll keep you up to date. Alexandre On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 at 14:22 Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com> wrote: > > > *From:* Alexandre Demers [mailto:alexandre.f.demers at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:30 PM > *To:* Deucher, Alexander; Christian König; Freedesktop - AMD-gfx > > > *Subject:* Re: Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 at 13:09 Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com> > wrote: > > > > *From:* amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] *On Behalf > Of *Christian König > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:37 PM > *To:* Alexandre Demers; Freedesktop - AMD-gfx > *Subject:* Re: Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu > > > > - Would we need a different firmware version with a different "hdr" for > the amdgpu driver? > > Yes, we should probably release the latest one instead of reusing the one > used with radeon. > > Actually, we should probably stick the same one as radeon for now until we > can verify the new firmware in general. Easier to start with a known > working case. > > > > OK. Then, is it expected to have a validation failure with the current > firmware? Is the header compatible with how the validation is done under > VCE2 and others or should I keep how it was done under radeon? > > There is no header on the multi-media firmware from radeon, so you'd need > to add one. The header is documented in amdgpu_ucode.h, All you'd need to > do is prepend the header to the existing firmware image. > > > > Alex > > > > > > > BTW: Does VCE work on CIK? Alex, don't we run into the same issue there as > well? > > VCE works on CIK. We ported VCE and UVD to CIK as part of the initial > amdgpu bring up. > > > > I've been using VCE2 port as my template for VCE1. My initial intention > was to work on UVD, but I ended up plugging in VCE in the first place. UVD > is on my todo list right next, I was expecting to working on it after > fixing the VCE part. > > > > > > Alex > > > > - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while having VCE > disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW? Completely failing > to load the driver for this reason seems overkill IMO, since nothing has > been loaded in memory and no registry have been modified up to that point. > > UVD and VCE are actually needed for correct power management. When the > blocks fail to initialize you usually sooner or later run into problems > with power management (e.g. stuck inside a certain power level). > > > > OK, but right now it is disabled, so the situation wouldn't be worst isn't > it? > > > > > > - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you could > help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last modifications need > to be done? > > Well you could, but to be honest without AMD releasing new firmware that > is most likely a futile effort. > > > > I'll send a patch then, and we'll navigate from there. This will allow me > to work on UVD in parallel. > > > > Alexandre Demers > > > > > Regards, > Christian. > > Am 14.06.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Alexandre Demers: > > Hi, > > > > I've been working on porting VCE1 from radeon to amdgpu in the last few > weeks. I'm pretty much done and I've enabled the functionality to see how > it goes. However, I ended up with an error on the firmware validation (size > doesn't seem to fit), thus failing completely in loading the driver. I'm > testing on a R9 280X (Tahiti). > > > > Three questions then: > > - Would we need a different firmware version with a different "hdr" for > the amdgpu driver? > > - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while having VCE > disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW? Completely failing > to load the driver for this reason seems overkill IMO, since nothing has > been loaded in memory and no registry have been modified up to that point. > > - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you could > help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last modifications need > to be done? > > > > Thank you! > > Alexandre Demers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > amd-gfx mailing list > > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170627/e2420971/attachment-0001.html>
