On 2017å¹´06æ??17æ?¥ 18:09, Christian König wrote: > The patch should still work on amd-staging-4.11, but drm-next has seen > some changes on how the handles are stored for dma-buf. > > This can potentially break the implementation and I think we need to > adapt before pushing it upstream, but I'm not 100% sure. Do you mean the patch needs to wait for next kernel promotion? 4.12? 4.13? Regards, David Zhou > > Christian. > > Am 16.06.2017 um 22:35 schrieb Alex Deucher: >> The patches look good to me. Christian what did you have in mind? >> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com >> <mailto:alexander.deucher at amd.com>> >> >> Alex >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM, zhoucm1 <david1.zhou at amd.com >> <mailto:david1.zhou at amd.com>> wrote: >> >> ping...? >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: upsteam find bo api >> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:16:24 +0800 >> From: zhoucm1 <david1.zhou at amd.com> <mailto:david1.zhou at amd.com> >> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> <mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Since patches are one feature, and contain kernel and libdrm, I attached >> them not by send-mail. Hope not inconvenience. >> >> 0001-drm-amdgpu-return-bo-itself-if-userptr-is-cpu-addr-o.patch is >> kernel patch. >> Other three is libdrm patches including unit test. >> >> please review. >> >> Regards, >> David Zhou >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >> <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170619/4122cc36/attachment.html>
