On 05/06/17 11:32 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Just back after a week off ... first thing I see on my vega10 system is this >> patch: >> >> 83866f0fc72017d55f40cbd4160cd1e42a2cc3a8 is the first bad commit >> commit 83866f0fc72017d55f40cbd4160cd1e42a2cc3a8 >> Author: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7 at gmail.com> >> Date: Thu Feb 2 00:38:22 2017 -0500 >> >> drm/amdgpu: allow split of queues with kfd at queue granularity v4 >> >> Previously the queue/pipe split with kfd operated with pipe >> granularity. This patch allows amdgpu to take ownership of an arbitrary >> set of queues. >> >> It also consolidates the last few magic numbers in the compute >> initialization process into mec_init. >> >> v2: support for gfx9 >> v3: renamed AMDGPU_MAX_QUEUES to AMDGPU_MAX_COMPUTE_QUEUES >> v4: fix off-by-one in num_mec checks in *_compute_queue_acquire >> >> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <funfunctor at folklore1984.net> >> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com> >> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7 at gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> >> >> :040000 040000 cafdad84e9fd950112e9ff56956526fa47dcaa59 >> 48647a91855c0b2d4b3dfedffb89bd93da25c0eb M drivers > > Looks like some of Andres' later patches were not properly rebased for > gfx9. Do to the two patches I send out this morning help? By visual inspection patch 1/2 seems to copy the patch I sent to the list this morning. I'll apply both on top of stg-4.11 and see what pops out. Cheers, Tom
