amd-gfx Digest, Vol 13, Issue 29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tom,

I have found the original patch which introduce the duplicate code.

The patch is in:
amd-gfx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 301

Alex Bin Xie

-----Original Message-----
From: Xie, AlexBin 
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 10:25 AM
To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: amd-gfx Digest, Vol 13, Issue 29

Hi, Tom,

You have found a bug.

Your patch looks fine for me.

Have you confirmed the deleted part is older version? Perhaps search email list or git history to confirm? 

Alex Bin Xie

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of amd-gfx-request at lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:00 AM
To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: amd-gfx Digest, Vol 13, Issue 29

Send amd-gfx mailing list submissions to
	amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	amd-gfx-request at lists.freedesktop.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	amd-gfx-owner at lists.freedesktop.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of amd-gfx digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu:  Fix ring initialization for GFX9
      (Tom St Denis)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon,  5 Jun 2017 07:46:01 -0400
From: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@xxxxxxx>
To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu:  Fix ring initialization for GFX9
Message-ID: <20170605114601.11995-1-tom.stdenis at amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

The commit 83866f0fc72017d55f40cbd4160cd1e42a2cc3a8 erroneously included the
old ring init sequence along with the new one which uses shared header definitions.

The fix which works on my vega10 seems to be to drop the old init sequence.

Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 26 --------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index 9502353ec325..8388893e0b11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -1586,32 +1586,6 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_sw_init(void *handle)
 		ring_id++;
 	}
 
-	/* set up the compute queues */
-	for (i = 0, ring_id = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_COMPUTE_QUEUES; i++) {
-		unsigned irq_type;
-
-		/* max 32 queues per MEC */
-		if ((i >= 32) || (i >= AMDGPU_MAX_COMPUTE_RINGS)) {
-			DRM_ERROR("Too many (%d) compute rings!\n", i);
-			break;
-		}
-		ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
-		ring->ring_obj = NULL;
-		ring->use_doorbell = true;
-		ring->doorbell_index = (AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_MEC_RING0 + i) << 1;
-		ring->me = 1; /* first MEC */
-		ring->pipe = i / 8;
-		ring->queue = i % 8;
-		ring->eop_gpu_addr = adev->gfx.mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr + (i * GFX9_MEC_HPD_SIZE);
-		sprintf(ring->name, "comp_%d.%d.%d", ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
-		irq_type = AMDGPU_CP_IRQ_COMPUTE_MEC1_PIPE0_EOP + ring->pipe;
-		/* type-2 packets are deprecated on MEC, use type-3 instead */
-		r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 1024,
-				     &adev->gfx.eop_irq, irq_type);
-		if (r)
-			return r;
-	}
-
 	r = gfx_v9_0_kiq_init(adev);
 	if (r) {
 		DRM_ERROR("Failed to init KIQ BOs!\n");
-- 
2.12.0



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


------------------------------

End of amd-gfx Digest, Vol 13, Issue 29
***************************************


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux