Would this fix the regression I found on Carrizo after the drm-next rebase?
Tom
On December 13, 2017 5:34:34 PM EST, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com> wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
>Reviewed-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare at amd.com>
>Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng at amd.com>
>Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h | 4 ----
> 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git
>a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>index 80d36610c302..f0002d63eb63 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>@@ -2053,9 +2053,6 @@ enum dc_status dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw(
> context,
> dc);
>
>- if (dc->hwss.enable_plane)
>- dc->hwss.enable_plane(dc, pipe_ctx, context);
>-
> if (DC_OK != status)
> return status;
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h
>index b6215ba514d8..5d2b05b93e76 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h
>@@ -138,10 +138,6 @@ struct hw_sequencer_funcs {
>
> void (*disable_plane)(struct dc *dc, struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx);
>
>- void (*enable_plane)(struct dc *dc,
>- struct pipe_ctx *pipe,
>- struct dc_state *context);
>-
> void (*update_info_frame)(struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx);
>
> void (*enable_stream)(struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx);
>--
>2.14.1
>
>_______________________________________________
>amd-gfx mailing list
>amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
